Automata clearly was Taro's first huge success so I think it would be wise to capitalize on it and make a sequel instead of making spinoffs in the latest fashion of Squarenix. Fairly enough as it's his newest game, not counting the remake, it just feels more polished in many ways compared to Replicant. Originally posted by wDariusw:I could be biased because Automata was my first experience but in my opinion, Automata is Taro's best creation so far.

and have whole series refreshed and rereleased.

To get to the point of Nier we need Drakengard 1 remake (similar to how Replicant was remade, its same game but with improved combat from Automata as legacy of Platinum games and Bayonetta with Devil May Cry DNA in it) first, and then we need Drakengard 3 remake which they really should rename to Drakengard 0, to not make the gap between 1 and 3 and to place it chronologically to where it really is, and with Drakegard 0 (3) and 1 we can forget about 2 and go directly to Replicant and then Automata. Why do we need Drakengard 3 if we dont have 1 and 2?Īlso Nier is direct Sequel to Drakengard 1, and 2 considered to be not very canon and was made without creator of series, while 3 is actually a 0 and a prequel to 1.

Originally posted by UselessFoetus:I mean running it on the ps3 emulator in higher res and fps is already great but I'd love a remaster like they did with replicant.ītw it was my first Yoko Taro game and even though I never managed to finish ending E (after 30 tries I had to watch it on youtube) its one of those game that will for ever stick with me, the story, the soundtrack.

Ps3 drakengard 3 download